Root text and autocommentary on Buddhist logic.

Collected writings chiefly on Buddhist philosophy; includes Buddhist doctrines.

Root text with two commentaries i.e. Sde bdun mdo daṅ bcas paʾi dgoṅs pa phyin ci ma log par ʾgrel pa tshad ma rigs paʾi gter gyi don gsal bar byed pa by Go-rams-pa Bsod-nams-seṅ-ge and Tshad ma rigs paʾi gter gyi mchan ʾgrel sde bdun gsal baʾi sgron me by ʾJam-dbyaṅs Blo-gter-dbaṅ-po on principles of Buddhist logic.

Root text and autocommentary on the principles of Buddhist logic.

Collected works of Sman-ri-ba Mnyam-med Shes-rabs-rgyal-mtshan, Bonpo scholar on Bon doctrines, reverential prayers, sadhanas and tantric texts.

Basic course of study on Buddhist logic according to Sa-skya-pa sect of Tibetan Buddhism.

Exegetical works on Buddhist doctrines and philosophies according to the interpretation of Sa-skya-pa sect.

Selected works of author's predominantly on Buddhist dialectical studies and mind training (Blo-sbyoṅ).

Explanatory notes on the philosophical position (sidhānta) of Vaibhāṣika, Sautrāntika, Yogācārya, and Mādhyamika schools of Buddhist with Hinduism according to Sa-skya-pa scholar.

On Tibetan Buddhist doctrines and philosophy according to Sa-skya-pa tradition.

Collected works of Sakyapa scholar Nag-dbang-legs-grub, 1811-1861 comprised predominantly on Sakyapa doctrines, Buddhist philosophy, rituals, tantras, reverential prayers, etc.

Collected works of author predominantly on Sakyapa liturgical, rituals, and sadhanas texts.

Root text accompanied with autocommentary on Bon logic.

Commentary on Sa-skya Paṇḍita Kun-dgaʼ-rgyal-mtshanʼs Tshad ma rigs gter, treatise on Buddhist logic.

Commentary on the Tshad ma rigs gter of Sa-skya Paṇḍita Kun-dgaʾ-rgyal-mtshan; dealing with Buddhist logic.

This paper examines a passage of the eleventh chapter of the Rigs gter of Sa skya Paṇḍita on the division of arguments by consequence of the form “Because S is P, it follows that it is Q” with respect to the type of relation between P and Q. This passage appears in quite different versions in several available recensions of the Rigs gter, all of which are problematic to some extent. The different interpretations of the commentators can be shown (...) to derive from their reliance on different versions of the text, which they strove to make sense of through two distinct strategies. Following up on the examination of a division of arguments by consequence along the same line in the works of Sa skya Paṇḍita’s Tibetan predecessors, in particular Phya pa Chos kyi seng ge and mTshur ston gZhon nu seng ge :883–938, 2016b), I evaluate the diverging versions of the Rigs gter against a coherent logical scenario founded on Sa skya Paṇḍita’s discussion pertaining to the types of logical reasons in inference in the tenth chapter of his work and comparison with the classification by Phya pa. I offer a hypothesis regarding the genesis of the problematic versions of the passage on the classification of consequences in the Rigs gter based on the comparison with the classification found in mTshur ston’s epistemological work. I propose that the composition of this portion of the Rigs gter might have involved a textual reuse of mTshur ston’s classification, even though mTshur ston and Sa skya Paṇḍita disagree on background issues. This very disagreement imposed changes to the reused text that led to problematic readings. (shrink)

Commentary on Tshad ma rigs gter, a work on Buddhist logic by Sa-skya Paṇḍi-ṭa Kun-dgaʾ-rgyal-mtshan, 1182-1251.

Contributed articles on epoch-making philosophical masterpiece of classical humanistics values and concentrated expression of the European renaissance ethics; translated into Tibetan.

Exhaustive commentary of the Mīmāṃsāsūtra of Jaimini, basic work of the Mimamsa school in Hindu philosophy.

Introduction on various aspects of Buddhist philosophical concepts.

Handbook for Buddhist ethical aspects for Bhutanese youngsters.